by Charles Hugh Smith
December 07, 2016
from CharlesHughSmith Website
If you want to understand today’s populism, don’t look to the mainstream media’s comically buffoonish propaganda blaming ‘the Russians’:
look at the four issues listed below…
One of the most disturbing failures of the mainstream media in this election cycle was its complete lack of historical context for Trump’s brand of populism.
If you consumed the mainstream media’s coverage of the campaign and election, you noted their obsession with speech acts (as opposed to concrete actions), personalities and conspiracy theories pinning American populism on Russian propaganda.
The mainstream media dismisses populism by pushing two absurdly ignorant narratives:
- Populism (we’re told) always leads to authoritarian rules and/or fascism (i.e. Nazism). All populist movements are therefore tarred with the Nazism brush: no good could possibly come from Populist movements because they always lead to fascism.
This is convenient for the apologists of the embattled status quo, but it’s utterly false: America’s enormous populist movements have never led to fascism.
- Since the status quo is wonderful and America’s economy is strong, dissent or populism cannot be home-grown – it must be the work of the Devil, in the guise of “foreign propaganda.”
Notice the classic propaganda ploy being deployed here:
since dissent is impossible in a regime as well-managed and prosperous as America’s status quo, populism must be driven and controlled by evil foreign agents.
This is laughably absurd:
America’s populist movements, including the present one, have been revolts against the concentrated wealth and power of self-serving status quo elites.
If the mainstream media actually employed well-informed analysts rather than empty-headed politically correct parrots, you might have learned that America has a long and rich history of populism that did not lead to authoritarianism or fascism.
Mike Swanson of WallStreetWindow.com and I recently discussed Populism and political realignments in a 34-minute podcast: Charles Hugh Smith on The Mainstream Media and the Populist Global Revolt.
There have been several major populist movements against the ruling elites:
Andrew Jackson‘s election in 1828 stemmed from such a revolt, and the Populist Party (a.k.a. People’s Party) and Socialist Party movements of the late 1800s and early 1900s were progressive/left-wing reactions to the enormous concentrations of wealth and power in the elites of the day.
Both movements attacked the money and credit mechanisms of the elites:
in Jackson’s case, the target was the Second Bank of the United States; in the Populist Party era, the issue was free silver, i.e. the expansion of the money supply via issuing silver coinage.
There are two dynamics at work beneath the surface of populist movements.
One is a transformation in the dominant mode of production, i.e. the organization and ownership of the productive assets that power economic growth, and the second is the political realignment that results from a transformation in the mode of production.
In the 19th century, agrarian interests that were losing power to industry and banking/ finance typically found expression in populist movements.
Such movements included an elite faction that saw its power and wealth being threatened by new elites. For example, England’s landed gentry resisted the political and economic power of industrialists, who sought an expansion of the engines of their wealth: global trade and a poorly paid, mobile urban workforce.
Mike mentioned a seminal book, Golden Rule – The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems, which proposes there is actually only one party in America: the property party, i.e. those who own the productive assets of the nation.
The winds of change can be understood by tracking which wealthy factions are funding the two political parties. Author Thomas Ferguson makes the case that Franklin Roosevelt won the presidency partly as a result of the financial support of large multinational corporations with global interests.
Roosevelt’s opponents were typically domestic companies that depended on cheap labor and stiff tariffs to keep out competition.
The current era of populism is perhaps best typified by Bernie Sanders, who raised a phenomenal $234 million from individuals, with Political Action Committees (PACS) contributing a thin sliver of $6.3 million to his campaign.
There is no better proof that today’s populism is deep-rooted and broad-based than Sanders’ astounding $234 million contributions from individuals, not elites. Please name me another presidential candidate who raised 97% of their funding from small donors.
Hillary Clinton raised a gargantuan $1.3 billion, of which $188 million came from Super-PACs. A tiny percentage of her total funds came from small donors; her campaign raised $556 million and the Democratic Party’s (elitist) fund-raising committees ponied up another $544 million. (source)
Trump‘s campaign raised about 27% of its funds from small donors, compared to the Romney campaign’s 6%.
Today’s populism has drawn funding from individuals and enterprises who have been left out of globalism’s massive increase in elitist wealth.
If we look for issues that crossed party lines, i.e. that drew support from both Sanders and Trump supporters, we find four core issues:
- Anti-globalism
- Disgust with the Establishment’s self-serving corrupt elites, i.e. anti-elitism
- Economic nationalism
- Anti-endless-neocon-wars, drone strikes, foreign entanglements
Issues 1, 3 and 4 were encapsulated in Democrat George McGovern‘s 1972 campaign slogan Come home, America, a message disdained by today’s Democratic Party elites, who have skimmed hundreds of millions in campaign contributions from global finance and corporate interests.
Take a look at these charts of U.S. corporate profits and the decline of labor’s share of GDP, and ask:
isn’t the source of today’s populist disgust and anger at America’s ruling elites rather obvious?
Is it coincidence that corporate profits skyrocketed from about 2001, right when labor’s share of GDP fell off a cliff?
If you want to understand today’s populism, don’t look to the mainstream media‘s comically buffoonish propaganda blaming the Russians: look at the four issues listed above and these two charts…
from TheFreeThoughtProject Website
Charitable institutions (like The Clinton Foundation), as Judge Jeanine Pirro has stated publicly, often serve as a slush fund for those whose name the institution bears.
Pirro called the Clintons’ foundation nothing more than a,
“money laundering operation used as a slush fund.”
Now, it seems, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and his institution are coming under fire for contributions it has been receiving from the Rothschild family, a controversial global mining company, and the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia.
Accusations of financial impropriety first arose back in 2008, when The Guardian first ran the story:
McCain was traveling through the UK, and made a stop at London’s Spencer House, where Judicial Watch, noted Washington watchdog organization, objected to the fundraiser luncheon hosted by the Rothschilds.
“The question is whether or not the Rothschilds paid for the event, the venue, the catering, or any other related costs,” asked Judicial Watch’s president Tom Fitton.
McCain wasn’t successful in defeating President Obama in the election.
Yet while his campaign for president is a thing of the past, McCain’s ties to the Rothschilds and others is present day subject matter. Wikileaks has made certain the issue will not go away.
The organization committed to governmental transparency revealed just how close of a relationship McCain has with the Rothschilds.
“Close Hillary Clinton friend Lynn Forester de Rothschild (Economist publisher) is a trustee of the Saudi-funded John McCain Institute,” Wikileaks’
tweetreads:
| |
And guess what. They’re right again…
A quick check of the McCain Institute’s Board of Trustees finds a photo of Ms. Rothschild, as well as her bio.
Since June 2002, Lady de Rothschild has been the Chief Executive of E.L. Rothschild LLC,a private investment company with investments in media, asset management, information technology, agriculture and real estate worldwide.
Holdings include The Economist Group (UK), Bronfman/E.L.Rothschild, real estate and financial instruments. Lady de Rothschild has been a director of The Estee Lauder Companies since December 2000 and The Economist Newspaper Limited (member of the Audit Committee) since October 2002 .
Also worth noting is the list of donors who’ve given $100,000 or more to the senator from Arizona’s institute hosted by Arizona State University.
A quick glance reveals at least one branch of the Rothschild family is on the list.
“The
Eranda Rothschild Foundation– Sir Evelyn and Lynn Forester de Rothschild,” is listed on the institute’s website as a significant donor.
Also listed as a donor is the highly controversial Phoenix-based mining company Freeport-McMoRan, whose gold and copper mining operations in West Papua, Indonesia are said to have brought poverty and genocide to the indigenous population.
“Indigenous tribes such as the Kamoro and the Amungme claim their communities have been racked with poverty, disease, oppression and environmental degradation since the mine began operations in 1973,” writes The Guardian.
Since the discovery of gold, and the alleged fraudulent handover of control to the Indonesian government in 1969, the country’s Muslim transmigration plan has resettled militant Muslims who have been systematically killing the Christian Kamoro and Amungme.
The resulting genocide has been going on for nearly five decades with very little international attention given to the extermination taking place, often referred to as the “
Last, but certainly not least, in the list of controversial donors to The McCain Institute, is the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia.
Yes. That’s right… The country with one of the worst human rights abuse records on the planet is a major donor to senator’s institute.
According to Amnesty International, the country where it’s a crime to play a guitar in public, is one of the worst countries to live it one wishes to engage in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
The authorities severely curtailed the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly, detaining and imprisoning critics, human rights defenders and minority rights activists on vaguely worded charges.
Torture and other ill-treatment of detainees remained common, particularly during interrogation, and courts continued to accept torture-tainted “confessions” to convict defendants in unfair trials.
Women faced discrimination in both law and practice and were inadequately protected against sexual and other violence.
The authorities continued to arrest, detain and deport irregular migrants. Courts imposed many death sentences, including for non-violent crimes and against juvenile offenders; scores of executions were carried out.
Coalition forces led by Saudi Arabia committed serious violations of international law, including war crimes, in Yemen.
An unconfirmed document, found on IMGUR, reportedly shows the foundation, in 2014, received $1,000,000 from the Saudis and $300,000 from The Eranda Rothschild foundation.
And while receiving funds, from organizations one might not agree with politically, is not a crime, keeping those funds may speak volumes about where Sen. McCain’s allegiances ultimately belong.
One only has to think back to 2001, when the World Trade Center was destroyed, allegedly by Saudi terrorist hijackers, to remember when the New York mayor chose to give back funds he received and considered to be insulting.
Rudi Giuliani gave back a check for 10 million dollars to the Saudi Royal Family, a gesture which drew bipartisan praise.
Likewise, the Rothschild family reportedly controls half of the world’s banks. The elitist banking family who has made its fortunes creating paper currency, and lending money at high interest rates, crippling the U.S. economy is seen by many as an enemy of the people.
Former U.S. Congressman Ron Paul once said they help control the Federal Reserve, and hand-select all appointments to government committee positions.
But it’s still anyone’s guess if the Rothschilds’ man in Washington is John McCain.
At any rate, he doesn’t seem to have a litmus test as to from whom he will receive money…
by Dave Hodges
June 2013
from TheCommonSenseShow Website
The Chinese Version of Agenda 21 and Why The U.S. Should Care
June 18, 2013
As most aware people already know, England often provides us with a forward-looking view of where our police state surveillance grid will be in three or four years.
The US has a matter canary in the mine from which to predict its future and it has to do with how China are implementing Agenda 21. China has long led the world in repressive and inhuman enforcement of its one child policies, mandatory sterilization and forced abortions.
We also know that China permits corporate slave labor (e.g. Walmart) within its boundaries by globalist corporations. China is indeed a model for the implementation of Agenda 21 and this implementation phase is taking a new and dramatic twist.
We in the US, should watch this Agenda 21 canary in the mine because it represents our future.
Agenda 21 Comes to China In Stealth
Agenda 21 is being implemented in China at breakneck speed and the latest phase and is coming in under stealth and deception.
The Chinese government is in the process of relocating 250,000 people per week from rural farmlands to densely populated urban areas into what has been dubbed as the Chinese ghost towns.
Many of us have heard about these Chinese ghost cities. However, until this year we didn’t really know the true purpose of why these ghost cities were being built.
However, the veil is being lifted and now it is becoming very obvious as to what the Chinese are up to.
China Is Now an Urban Country
China’s urban population has passed the 50% mark, according to China’s Bureau of Statistics.
America reached this milestone in 1920, almost a full century before the Chinese and our urbanization was fueled by the demand for cheap labor to fill the new factory jobs.
The Communist Chinese regime touts urbanization as the engine behind China’s future economic development. The Chinese propagandists are telling the masses that they must accept relocation from rural to urban because it will fuel the Chinese economy of the future.
And what the Chinese propagandists are telling the people is a lie and as with many things in politics, there is the reason and there is the real reason.
Lies and Damn Lies
Although the Chinese government and a select few globalist corporations claim that the Chinese urban population migration is fueled by the need for workers, other Chinese experts tell a different story.
In a Nov. 23, 2011 report, the Beijing Times, one of the most liberal of the Chinese newspapers, quoted the deputy inspector at China’s National Land Bureau, Gan Zangchun, said that the government land acquisition has created “fake urbanization.”
In other words, the Chinese urbanization, based upon economic reasons, is a fraud.
Then why is there an urgency on the part of the Chinese government to move its population to urban areas at such a rapid pace and with such inhumanity?
The Real Reasons
For the past few years, people in the West were baffled as to why the Chinese were building massive ghost cities that can house over 1 million people each and yet, these ghost cities were dormant until just recently.
The Chinese have over 65 million micro-apartments which lies vacant in these ghost cities.
The urbanization of America took place in proportion to the number of factory jobs which were available well into the industrial period of our history. The American factory jobs enticed future workers to leave the farm and relocate to cities.
However, China is taking a “build it and they will come” approach. In other words, the more naive among us are supposed to believe that if the people move into the cities, factory jobs will follow.
Stalin tried it as did Pol Pot, and it did not work and what we are really looking at here is a cover story.
More Chinese Experts Debunk the State Propaganda
Chinese political refugee and Princeton University professor, Cheng Xiaonong, stated in that in lots of places in China, farmers are being forcibly relocated at gun point and forced to relocate to urban areas.
Cheng said,
“[Party chief] Bo Xilai has been promoting a policy of moving farmers into towns, building apartments and moving forcibly relocated farmers into these stack and pack apartments and treating this as urbanization.”
Cheng said urbanization isn’t about calculating how many farmers are relocated into cities, but about farmers being able to move into the city and gaining some measure of sustainable employment and adequate living conditions.
These relocated farmers, without the prospect of jobs is a recipe for economic and social disaster. Soon, there will be tens of millions of Chinese totally dependent on government handouts to survive. This is the power that governments strive to obtain because it gives them total control.
This Chinese scene is reminiscent of the Agenda 21 inspired movie, Hunger Games.
Cheng makes the same observations as many other Chinese experts as he added that,
“urbanization is generally accompanied by economic growth as was the case in the US. In other countries, urbanization happens naturally, but in mainland China, urbanization is the result of the Chinese regime forcefully pushing farmers off of their land.”
Since the Chinese are not industrialized to the point which would justify the mass movement of 1 million people per month into its ghost towns, any reasonable person would be asking the question, why?
Who Is Behind Chinese Urbanization?
The Chinese government have held many conferences in which they have received consultation from some very disturbing sources, known to most of us as the global elite.
Who could forget Hank Paulson, the former Secretary of the Treasury and the former CEO of Goldman Sachs? Paulson is championing the strategy of forced relocation.
In relation to Paulson’s observation and encouragement of Chinese urbanization he states,
“The country’s economy is heading in the right direction. This is more important than achieving short-term growth.”
Paulson went on to say that the economic growth in China has made urbanization a necessary and proper development. Are you kidding me? We have heard from Chinese experts, both inside and outside the country, who claim that economics is not fueling urban growth.
Chinese urban growth is being fueled by bayonets and bullets. Hank Paulson is such a gem…
Hank Paulson
I’m sure you remember Mr. too-big-to-fail, Hank Paulson, when he told Congress that if we, the American taxpayer, did not bail out Wall Street, there would be an economic collapse and we would have martial law and the rest as they say, is history.
And bailout after bailout has come and gone and the net effect is that the American economy is in a tailspin. And the Chinese are taking advice from him? That’s like taking advice from Dr. Kevorkian on how to preserve life.
Another key globalist, Dominic Barton, the global managing director of McKinsey & CO, and he too sounds like a Paulson clone as recently stated,
“The good news is that there is an underlying force of growth and that’s urbanization. What we’re basically seeing is more we than 250,000 people moving from rural areas to cities every week.”
Maurice Strong and George Soros are also players in this mass migration movement.
If job demand is not fueling urbanization, then what is?
Getting Down to the Truth
It would seem that key globalists are trying to disguise the real reasons on why the Chinese government is forcibly relocating one million farmers per month to their ghost cities.
Ask yourself America, where have we seen the philosophical belief that rural areas should be uninhabited and the population should be herded into densely populated stack and pack cities?
Make no mistake about it, the Chinese with the backing of globalist corporations like Goldman Sachs, are engaged in full-blown Agenda 21 relocation of its civilian population from rural areas to the stack and pack of their mega-cities. From the outside looking in, it looks like a beta test.
And there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the same is preparing to happen in the United States.
The Chinese Are Behind a Barrel and They Have Pointed That Barrel On Their People
Why would the Japanese be taking marching orders from Paulson, Strong, Soros and company?
The answer is simple, the Chinese government hopes to survive the coming bond collapse in the US which could happen in mere days, weeks or months. The Chinese hold much of our debt in bonds.
The Chinese have undoubtedly come to the full realization that their economy will massively implode when American bonds crash.
By moving one million people per month to the ghost cities, the Chinese will find that subjugating their country will be much easier when a martial law crackdown is instituted as necessitated by the coming economic catastrophe.
It is also not difficult to speculate that the Chinese have made an under the table deal with the global elite to be the beta test for Agenda 21 style population forced relocation to stave absolute financial ruin.
Thanks to Mayor Bloomberg, the San Francisco City Council, the concept of transition towns, inner city developmental tax breaks for construction and much more, America is following suit with the Chinese style Agenda 21 policies on many fronts and this is the topic of Part two of this series.
And I will give the reader one hint on where this is going, the first area of the US to be relocated will be the Gulf and you can take that to the bank.
The Forced Depopulation of America’s Rural Areas
June 19, 2013
Agenda 21 policy calls for dramatically increasing urbanization and forcing indigenous populations out of rural areas and into densely populated stack and pack micro apartments controlled by technocrats with the ability to control every aspect of one’s life.
When completed, this lifestyle will be a hell on earth.
In Part One above, I detailed how the Chinese government, under the direction of global corporations like Goldman Sachs, is instituting a mass relocation of its population from rural to urban.
At the point of a gun, the Chinese military is forcibly removing one million Chinese farmers per month from their rural homes and forcing them into the massive ghost cities from which China has spent nearly $3 trillion to construct.
The Chinese government, Hank Paulson and other globalists falsely claim that the mass relocation of Chinese farmers is necessary to fuel the Chinese economy. Yet, there are no jobs available to these Chinese farmers when they arrive in the ghost cities.
Strong industry and the need to fill positions is what drew Americans into the cities during our industrial revolution, not the other way around as the globalists are claiming is the case in China.
What we are witnessing in China is the beginning of the implementation of the Agenda 21 creation of massive megacities complete with stack and pack micro apartments.
As in China, there is a decided plot to move American farmers off of their land and into urban areas and this plot commenced nearly two decades ago and is currently picking up momentum.
The American and Chinese methods for depopulating rural areas are different, but the net effect is exactly the same.
Can you imagine if the US military, as is happening in China, were to forcibly relocate American farmers to urban areas under the threat of violence from the military?
The US would witness the outbreak of widespread violence. Unlike the Chinese farmers who are being forced by gunpoint off of their land. American farmers are being nudged off of their land by market forces created by covert government policy.
When both countries achieve virtual depopulation of the rural areas of their respective countries, only the government subsidized corporate farms will remain. Local communities and their individual citizens will lose total control over all food and this is a prescription for disaster.
“I will determine what and how much you may drink”
Mayor Bloomberg
If you wonder why New York City Mayor Bloomberg and Michelle Obama have been trying to control the size of sodas, the amount of salt one can use and are dictating what school children will eat for lunch, the answer is that they are conditioning the American public that the government controls all food intake.
The reasons for these new controls over diet will become painfully clear after reading the following paragraphs.
Rural Flight In the United States
I know that this will come as a shock to many reading this article because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN.
However, in actuality, the process of moving the United States towards a complete Agenda 21 style of total urbanization has already commenced and it began nearly 20 years ago.
In 1994, the US became official participants in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was a ‘liberalized’ trade agreement between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.
Under NAFTA, farmers’ income in all three countries has plummeted and millions of small farmers have lost their land, while agribusiness corporations (i.e. large government subsidized corporate farms) have reaped huge profits.
NAFTA has had three dramatic effects on farmers in North America and all three effects further the cause dense urbanization as outlined in Agenda 21 documents.
The Roots of Illegal Immigration
The first notable effect of NAFTA is that it immediately bankrupted over three million farmers in northern Mexico and this group became the vanguard of millions of Mexicans illegally entering the US in search for subsistence work of any type.
“Damn NAFTA!”
Depopulating Rural Areas By Bankrupting US Farmers
The second dramatic impact of NAFTA lies in the fact that it has had catastrophic consequences for US farmers as a record number of small farmers have lost their farms and have gone through foreclosure while the government subsidized corporate farms have thrived.
Since NAFTA, the average annual growth of the US trade deficit has been 45% higher. Since NAFTA took effect, about 170,000 small family farms have gone bankrupt which represents a decline of 21% of family farms in the US.
The 21% of America small farmers who have been bankrupted since the advent of NAFTA, represents a higher percentage of displaced American farmers than what is happening with forced relocation of Chinese farmers to the ghost cities.
And what happens to American small farmers who have lost their livelihood? They either work on their former competitors corporate farms as hired hands, or they relocate to urban areas in search of employment.
American Farmers – Death By a Thousand Cuts
If it is not the EPA enforcing its Agenda 21 wetlands regulations with devastating consequences on farmers, it is the FDA harassing farmers for pursuing time-honored farm related industries such as the raw milk industry.
Congress is plotting new attacks on the US farmer as I write these words. Even Amish farmers have felt the wrath of the federal government. Average, everyday Americans are being arrested for merely growing their own food.
Whether it is China or the US, Agenda 21 urbanization policies are designed for the purpose of herding people into dense urban areas for reasons of control and the primary method of control has to do with controlling food production.
The US Government Is Gaining Control Over All Food
The Chinese government is working towards to the control over all food in order to control the people.
On an ever increasing basis, NAFTA is providing the US government with the exact same ability. Therefore, the third draconian impact of NAFTA is that it has led to even more nefarious free trade agreements which led to the loss of control for local communities over its own food supply.
Underlying the World Trade Organization, the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and the Central American Free Trade Agreement is the philosophy that all food (i.e. from basic grains, meat, fruits and vegetables) should be exclusively produced for international export.
This is a drastic departure from the time honored practice where each country produced the majority of food its citizens needed on local, small farms and only traded in certain products that could not be successfully grown locally.
If anyone wonders where this is headed, we only have to look to Africa for the answer.
The very first great wave of a NAFTA style of globalization in agriculture took place in Africa, Asia, and Latin America as global corporations forced local farmers to give up local food production, and shifted production to plantations using enslaved Indigenous and African labor to grow the luxury crops of coffee, sugar, bananas, and cocoa for export to the colonizing countries.
The lesson here is, if the government controls the food, the government controls the people.
Starvation Will Be Used to Enforce the Agenda 21 Depopulation of Rural Areas
The use of food by the U.S. government has been a matter of official U.S. governmental covert policy since 1974-1975.
In December, 1974, National Security Council directed by Henry Kissinger completed a classified study entitled, “National Security Study Memorandum 200 – Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests – NSSM 200 “
The study was based upon the unproven claims that population growth in Lesser Developed Countries (LDC) constituted a serious risk to America’s national security.
In November 1975 President Ford, based upon the tenets of NSSM 200 outlined a classified plan to forcibly reduce population growth in LDC countries through birth control, war and famine.
Ford’s new national security adviser, Brent Scowcroft, in conjunction with CIA Director, George H. W. Bush, were tasked with implementing the plan and the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture assisted in the implementation of these insane genocidal plans.
NSSM 200 formally raised the question,
“Would food be considered an instrument of national power?… Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?”
Kissinger has answered these questions when he stated that he was predicting a series of contrived famines, created by mandatory programs and this would make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary in this modern day application of eugenics in a scheme that would allow Henry to have his cake and eat it too in that the world would finally be rid of the “useless eaters!”
Third world population control, using food as one of the primary weapons, has long been a matter of official covert national policy and a portion of President Obama’s Executive Order (EO 13603), National Defense Resources Preparedness is a continuation of that policy.
Only now, the intended target are not the LDC’s but, instead, the American people.
With the stroke of his pen, Obama has total and absolute control over all food where his EO states:
- “Food resources” means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption. “Food resources” also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.
- “Food resource facilities” means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer…
NAFTA was merely the opening artillery bombardment against the American farmer and the ultimate depopulation of rural areas. The death of the American farmer will ultimately come at the hands of EO 13603 and I believe this will be fully implemented when Obama declares martial law.
“Thank God That I Do Not Live On a Farm”
Put this map into your GPS, it will tell where you soon cannot go.
Do you think that you and your family are actually safe from the ravages of depopulating the rural areas through economic blackmail and ultimate starvation?
Think again!
Unless you presently live in the core inner city and occupy less than 500 square feet of living space, your government, as I write these words, is actively plotting to get you out of the suburbs and into densely populated urban areas and this will be fully exposed in Part three of this series.
Depopulating An Entire Region of the Country
June 21, 2013
In the first three parts of this series, it was demonstrated that both the US government and the Chinese government are engaged in an Agenda 21 motivated plot to relocate rural and suburban residents to more densely populated urban centers to live in overcrowded conditions where a person’s every movement and every activity is monitored.
The previously described policies are proving effective in moving populations into densely populated urban centers in accordance with Agenda 21 policy. However, the process is not as speedy as the globalists had hoped. The global elite needed a game changing event in the United States.
In order to speed things up, the elite bankers at Goldman Sachs masterminded the Gulf oil spill to this end.
The Gulf Oil Spill Is a Depopulation Event of Epic Proportions
In order to demonstrate the fact that the BP event was indeed planned event and is part of a bigger scheme to depopulate the Gulf of its 40 million residents, it is necessary to present a review of the money trail in the Gulf which shows forethought, planning and motive as a precursor to more important reasons on why the Gulf had to be destroyed.
Follow the Money
When I first investigated the Gulf even in a seven part series, I believed I was looking at an event that was motivated by pure greed.
Although the major players (e.g. BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Goldman Sachs) did make huge sums of money from this planned catastrophe, I have since discovered the event was not just perpetrated for purposes of greed alone.
The net effect of the Gulf event is that it is a depopulation event and the government is in league with perpetrators of this event to achieve this end.
It is not just possible to demonstrate that the Gulf oil explosion was a planned event, it is possible to pinpoint the date when the wheels were put into motion which would make it nearly impossible for any investigation to get to the bottom of the event by American authorities.
The subsequent cover-up for this event began in 2007, three years before the event, as Goldman Sachs reorganized Transocean, the owner of the destroyed oil rig, into a Cayman Island corporation.
In doing so, it made Transocean virtually impossible for Congress to investigate and subsequently discipline the perpetrators.
Unashamedly, Goldman Sachs and Transocean instituted a “put option” on Transocean’s stock for Transocean insiders, the very morning of the explosion.
Transocean boldly walked away with a $270 million dollar profit immediately following the explosion because they had doubly indemnified the rig only weeks prior to the explosion through Lloyds of London. This alone should have been enough to trigger a massive investigation.
Within three weeks prior to the oil rig explosion, Goldman Sachs dumped the lion’s share of their BP stock.
Just another coincidence, you say? Then explain why BP CEO Tony Hayward sold 40% of his BP holdings in the weeks prior to the spill and paid off his mortgage on his estate in Kent, England, avoided staggering losses.
And true to form involving the pattern of perpetuating a false flag event with media complicity, on June 8, 2010, less than six weeks following the oil spill, BP bought Google and Yahoo Search Terms, related to the oil spill, in an obvious attempt to conceal as much of the truth as possible from the public.
There are yet more financial coincidences.
At the time of the oil rig explosion, Halliburton was drilling at the base of the Deepwater Horizon. Very coincidentally, only 11 days before, on April 9, 2010, Halliburton purchased Boots and Coots for a quarter of a billion dollars.
Just who is Boots and Coots?
Coincidentally, they are the largest oil clean up firm in the world And when the explosion took place 11 days later, wasn’t it fortunate that Halliburton was there armed with Boots and Coots as they capitalized on their timely good fortune.
Subsequently, Halliburton’s profits increased 83% in just 3 months following the Gulf Oil Crisis subsequent to the clean-up efforts. It was simply raining coincidences!
The top five dumping institutions of BP stock just prior to the spill included Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P., Wachovia Bank National Association and it is important to note that Wachovia is a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs, thus, making this one tight little family of co-conspirators.
We also see massive dumping of Sanders Capital, LLC and PNC Bank, National Association brings noted globalist George Soros into the conspiracy as well.
Obama Identified As a Profiteering Co-Conspirator
The late Bob Chapman, while appearing the Alex Jones Show in June of 2010, revealed that Obama’s only asset holder, Vanguard I and Vanguard II, dramatically sold off BP stock only few weeks before Gulf oil explosion.
Chapman also revealed that,
“According to this FSB report the largest seller of BP stock in the weeks before this disaster occurred was theAmericaninvestment company known as
Vanguardwho through two of their financial arms (Vanguard Windsor II Investor and Vanguard Windsor I Investor) unloaded
over 1.5 million shares of BP stocksaving their investors hundreds of millions of dollars, chief among them was President Obama.
The FSB further estimates in this report that through Obama’s three accounts in the Vanguard 500 I
ndex Fundhe stands to make another $100 million over the next 10 years as t
heir largest stock holdingis in the energy giant
Exxon Mobil they believe will eventually acquire BPand all of their assets for what will be essentially a “rock bottom” price and which very predictably
BP has hired Goldman Sachsto advise them on.”
Watch the entire interview below:
This complicity on the part of the President explains why EPA director, Lisa Jackson, refused to hold BP’s feet to the fire for using the most deadly and least effective oil dispersant, Corexit.
BP and Goldman Sachs hold the controlling interest in Nalco. Nalco is the manufacturer of Corexit.
Therefore,
- BP
- Goldman Sachs
- Transocean
- Halliburton
- the President of the United States,
…made money on the clean up from the spill.
Obama’s participation ties together the link between these rogue corporations and the government.
You now have to ask yourself. When it comes to this event, are you a coincidence theorist or a well documented conspiracy theorist? More importantly, this event is much more than a financial conspiracy.
This conspiracy is more motivated by the desire to depopulate the Gulf Coast.
The Eventual Depopulation of 40 Million Americans From the Gulf
The entire ecosystem of the Gulf has been damaged beyond repair because of the use of the controversial dispersant, Corexit, the people in the Gulf are being exposed to poisoned air, water and food.
Much has been made of the cleanup workers from the Exxon Valdez oil spill and their ultimate fate. Most died before reaching the age of 51.
Researchers, Wilma Subra and Kim Anderson et al., have detailed how many people in the Gulf cannot expect to live a normal lifespan because of the high rate of cancer causing chemicals found in Gulf subjects bloodstreams.
This makes the Gulf a depopulation event by definition.
The Army Corps of Engineers have been positioned to engage in a future and direct Gulf depopulation action.
According to the Army Corps of Engineers, in 2007 the US government allocated $40 billion dollars for a project to depopulate the Gulf Coast region. The Army Corps of Engineers spokesperson and project director, S.I. Rees, downplayed the importance of the $40 billion allocation.
However, the funding is available for the express purpose of relocating Gulf residents and was admitted to by Ries on air.
The original document which detailed the Corps’ Gulf depopulation project is now classified was done so after Jesse Ventura exposed the plan on his show, Conspiracy Theory, on December 10, 2010.
If you would like to actually view the cover page and the first page of the document, simply Web Search Jesse Ventura and the Louisiana Conspiracy video and move the time bar to about 35 minutes:
The Gulf Region Is An Ever-Increasing Armageddon Ripe for Mandatory Evacuation
In addition to imperiling the food supply and destroying the health of the residents, the Gulf disaster is overwhelming the environment and threatens to bring disaster to the southeastern portion of the United States on an unprecedented scale.
The holocaust in the Gulf has grown to such proportions that the European Union Times reports issued a grave report which was prepared for President Medvedev by Russia’s Ministry of Natural Resources in which the report warns that the BP spill will become the worst environmental catastrophe in all of human history and will bring total destruction to the Eastern half of the North American continent.
The environmental damage has spread as far north as Memphis as local residents report toxic rainfall, containing Corexit, is falling on and damaging local farmers crops.
This report aired over two years ago and was among the first indicators that the evapotranspiration will cycle was impacted by the Deepwater Horizon explosion and the subsequent use of Corexit to “disperse” the spilled oil.
The oil which is still emanating from the seafloor contains about 40% methane, compared with about 5% found in typical oil deposits, said John Kessler, a Texas A&M University oceanographer who is studying the impact of methane from the spill.
Kessler et al, in June of 2010, warned the public that methane was not going to dissipate on its own and that it would continue to increase and come ashore with unpredictable results.
Merchant Marine expert, Captain Kelly Sweeney, while appearing on The Common Sense Show, on July 10, 2010, made similar predictions in which he stated that he and many of his sources feared catastrophic methane explosions near several coastal cities which could be triggered by the right atmospheric conditions combined with the high levels of highly flammable methane.
Listen below a ‘Hour 1’ of this interview:
Methane Explosion
There are also massive sinkholes and enormous amounts of escaping methane gas from the Bayou Corne, LA. disaster area is particularly concerning.
Local officials have made repeated references to “powerful underground forces” which are causing the monster sinkholes in the swampland, which has already led to the evacuation of 150 homes and has led to a heated discussion regarding the likelihood of a methane-bubble tsunami from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico BP explosion.
Government officials have warned the local leadership that these high levels of methane pose serious risks to health, fire and could even lead to large explosions. Officials have further warned that local residents needed to obey any coming mandatory evacuation orders.
There is no defense against leaking methane and this situation is spreading through the salt domes in the region.
Methane has been proven to enter structures through foundational cracks or through sewer traps if the house or office is built on or near landfills, and in the case of Louisiana, it can come through salt domes where the oil and the Corexit has been accumulating for three years. Methane gas can also be ingested.
Originally thought to be a remote possibility, methane gas can migrate into the natural water reservoirs.
Yet, this is exactly what has happened. And these precise conditions are serving to impact the drinking water supplies as well as the safety of area crops because of the evapotranspirational cycle. This is not a predicted event in Louisiana, it is exactly what is happening right now.
The Gulf is a poisonous powder keg designed to get the people to either die prematurely or to force them out of the Gulf in a mass exodus.
Peter Sutherland – A Person of Strong Interest
Many have asked if there was a central figure who coordinated this conspiracy.
To that question, I have to state that I cannot definitively point to one single person.
However, if I were an unencumbered investigator and not operating under the umbrella of an agenda, I would want to look closely at a globalist named Peter Sutherland as the possible mastermind.
Peter Sutherland
Peter Sutherland is an insider’s, insider.
He is on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group, he is an Honorary Chairman of the Trilateral Commission (2010-present), he was Chairman of the Trilateral Commission (Europe) (2001-2010) and Sutherland was Vice Chairman of the European Round Table of Industrialists (2006–2009).
Sutherland was also the former head of the World Trade Organization and the related GATT. Sutherland is the ultimate insider.
More to the point, from 1996-2009, Sutherland was the CEO of BP. In 2009, he resigned from BP and assumed a “non-executive” CEO position with Goldman Sachs, less than a year before the Gulf Event. As if this is not enough to raise eyebrows, here is where Sutherland becomes my primary person of interest in this conspiracy.
In 2006, Peter Sutherland was appointed as the special representative (SRSG) on the United Nations International Migration and Development. The UN’s International Migration and Development would be in charge of large scale population movements were to take place in the Gulf region.
Remember the $40 billion dollar relocation fund given to the Army Corps of Engineers to evacuate the Gulf?
Well, guess who would be in charge? Peter Sutherland would be in charge through his role with the UN. Sutherland was and is in the catbird seat to coordinate this entire conspiracy in order to profit from the spill and to depopulate the Gulf. Murderers have been convicted on far less circumstantial evidence.
Yet, through all the fake congressional investigations over this event, Sutherland’s name is not listed in the Congressional Registry even one time.
Is it even possible that one person sitting in his rural home in Arizona can find this multitude of interrelated facts and a Congress with unlimited investigative resources cannot?
From Regional Depopulation to Continental Depopulation
The Gulf Stream is a strong interlinked component of the Earth’s global network of ocean conveyor currents, which drive the planet’s weather systems.
Dr. Gianluigi Zangari echoes many scientists when they express concern over the fact that the Gulf Stream, known as the Loop Current, has all but stopped and has been irreparably damaged by the oil spill.
This is why Europe has recorded its two coldest winters in the last two winters.
The Gulf Loop
For this reason, Zangari’s concern is that should the Loop Current fail to restart, and it has not to date, dire global consequences may ensue as a result of extreme weather changes and many other critical phenomena as the result of a new ice age caused by the loss of the mitigating effect that the Loop Current.
Zangari states that the repercussions of which could trigger widespread droughts, floods, crop failures and subsequent global food shortages as well as a mini ice age in Europe.
As an aside, I have had several of my European students tell me that since 2010, many European schools are teaching their young that Europe could experience an ice age and the inhabitants would be forced to relocate to the Southern Hemisphere, most likely in Africa.
I believe I have told you just how this will happen. This would be population migration on a massive scale.
Conclusion
There are a myriad of ways that the Gulf is being rendered uninhabitable and add to that the fact that economy in the Gulf has been devastated which has forced even more to leave.
If the globalists were to do nothing else to the Gulf, in 20 years, the Gulf would be unrecognizable.
The death curve will surely spike to due to the invasive nature of the Corexit poisoning in so many facets of the residents lives. However, I am predicting another game changing event in the Gulf to exacerbate the exodus which is already happening.
Some have noted that the sinkhole phenomenon will spread like wildfire and will nudge more people out of the Gulf.
Yet, others have suggested that HAARP will be used to ignite methane in the Gulf waters near coastal cities which would force mass evacuations. I do not know what their move is. However, what I do know that within most of our lifetimes, we will see a mass relocation from the Gulf into urban areas.
There is one variable which is also underlying this entire event that I will leave you with in closing.
For reasons that I will reveal in a future article, the Gulf needs to be vacated on the coast to facilitate the new energy business run by Soros, Gore and friends and it can only happen in an ecological dead zone.
In achieving the goals of Agenda 21, the ends always justifies the means.
